Bounded Rationality and Voting Decisions over 160 Years: Voter Behavior and Increasing Complexity in Decision-Making
نویسندگان
چکیده
Using a quasi-natural voting experiment encompassing a 160-year period (1848-2009) in Switzerland, we investigate whether a higher level of complexity leads to increased reliance on trusted parliamentary representatives. We find that when more referenda are held on the same day, constituents are more likely to refer to parliamentary recommendations when making their decisions. This finding holds true even when we narrow our focus to referenda with a relatively lower voter turnout on days on which more than one referendum is held. We also demonstrate that when constituents face a higher level of complexity, they follow the parliamentary recommendations rather than those of interest groups. "Viewed as a geometric figure, the ant's path is irregular, complex, hard to describe. But its complexity is really a complexity in the surface of the beach, not a complexity in the ant." ( [1] p. 51).
منابع مشابه
Bounded Rationality and Voting Decisions Exploring a 160-Year Period
Using a natural voting experiment in Switzerland that encompasses a 160-year period (1848–2009), we investigate whether a higher level of complexity leads to increased reliance on expert knowledge. We find that when more referenda are held on the same day, constituents are more likely to refer to parliamentary recommendations in making their decisions. This finding holds true even when we narro...
متن کاملRational Choice Theory: A Cultural Reconsideration
Economists have heralded the formulation of the expected utility theorem as a universal method of choice under uncertainty. In their seminal paper, Stigler and Becker (Stigler & Becker, 1977) declared that “human behavior can be explained by a generalized calculus of utility-maximizing behavior” (p.76). The universality of the rational choice theory has been widely criticized by psychologists, ...
متن کاملBounded rationality and Epistemic Logic
As it is well known, there exists a chasm between the picture of perfect rationality on which modern mainstream economics is by and large built, and the limited reasoning and decision making abilities displayed by real agents. Herbert Simon groundbreaking work (cf., for instance, Simon 1955) pioneered research on bounded rationality. At the onset a study of administrative and organizational beh...
متن کاملSatisfaction and adaptation in voting behavior: an empirical exploration
Dynamic models of learning and adaptation have provided realistic predictions in terms of voting behavior. This study aims at contributing to their scant empirical verification. We develop a learning algorithm based on bounded rationality estimating the pattern of learning process through a two-stage econometric model. The analysis links voting behavior to past choices and economic satisfaction...
متن کاملModeling Risky Economic Decision-Making with Bounded Rationality
Models of economic decisions often assume people maximize a preference or utility function. While this assumption provides insights into a wide range of economic behavior, in some cases its predictions contradict observed behavior. We illustrate this situation with human-subject experiments of decisions involving risk. We show how the addition of bounded rationality to the economic model can ex...
متن کامل